Article [4]Editorial Board

One workspace for every editorial decision.

Abstract

Editorial Board is where editors-in-chief, section editors and managing editors run peer review. Assignments, reviews, revisions and decision letters sit on one manuscript record, with each role seeing only what your review model allows.

  • Queues by stage, age and handling editor
  • Decision letters from templates written in your journal's voice
  • Roles and permissions that follow single-blind, double-blind or open review
J. Soil Microbial Sci./Editor workspace4 in your queue
29 dMedian to first decision
1Reviews overdue
31%Accept rate, 12 mo
ManuscriptStageAge
JMS-2026-0418
Soil microbiome shifts under drip irrigation
Reviews inDay 31
JMS-2026-0422
Nitrogen fixation in intercropped millets
Awaiting reviewersDay 6
JMS-2026-0409
Biochar and fungal network recovery
Revision dueDay 58
JMS-2026-0401
Metagenomes of saline paddy soils
Ready to decideDay 47
Figure 1. The editor workspace, with time to first decision and the manuscripts that need attention.
J. Soil Microbial Sci./JMS-2026-0418/DecisionAccepted

Day 44 · Editor-in-Chief · Revision 1

Dear Dr. Rao,

Thank you for your careful revision. Both reviewers are satisfied with the changes, and I am pleased to accept your manuscript for publication.

Send letter Send to Production Line
Figure 2. A decision letter ready to send, with the next step to Production Line.
1.

See what needs you today

Each editor opens to the manuscripts waiting on them, ordered by stage and age. Managing editors see the whole journal: overdue reviews, revisions due back and decisions ready to make.

  • Personal and journal-wide queues
  • Overdue alerts with one-click reminders
  • Time to first decision and to acceptance
2.

Reviews and revisions on one record

Reviewer reports, author responses and every revision round are kept together, with a side-by-side view of what changed. Editors write decisions from templates and can edit every word before sending.

  • Structured review forms per journal
  • Revision comparison between rounds
  • Letter templates for each decision type
J. Soil Microbial Sci./Roles and permissionsDouble-blind
RoleCan see and doPeople
Editor-in-ChiefFinal decisions, all sections1
Section editorsAssign reviewers, recommend6
Managing editorChecks, reminders, letters1
ReviewersOwn invitations only212

Author and reviewer identities are masked from each other under double-blind review.

Figure 3. Roles and permissions for a journal running double-blind review.
3.

A record you can stand behind

Every assignment, invitation, decision and message is recorded with who did it and when. If a decision is ever questioned, the history is complete.

Table 1

Editorial Board at a glance

Roles
Editor-in-Chief, section editor, managing editor, reviewer, guest editor
Review models
Single-blind, double-blind, open and transparent review
Special issues
Guest editors with access limited to their issue
Audit trail
Every action recorded with user and time
Acknowledgements

Every journal on Plascipub starts the same way: one letter, fifty free submissions, and an editorial office ready the same week.

50
submissions free, no card needed
1 week
typical setup for a new journal
Ref. PLS-ACC-2026Decision: Accept

Dear Editor, we are pleased to accept your journal.

Your submissions, reviews, integrity checks, proofs and DOIs can live in one place from today. No revisions required. Start free, bring your back issues when you are ready, and keep your own branding throughout.

With best wishes for your next issue,The Plascipub editorial office